Climate: public opinion

Yesterday's post ended with the hope that experts’ reports on climate change, together with more and more peoples’ direct experience with its effects though more and more dramatic weather patterns, might finally affect public opinion and so push political decision-makers towards real action.

After writing that, I went looking to see what survey data might show.  I’ll keep looking, but the first stuff I found wasn’t exactly reassuring.  This Gallup poll, published March 18, 2014, reports that fewer people now than in 2001 think human actions are responsible for changes in the environment.  The whole timeline deserves attention, but this is still the basic finding.  Depressing.

Climate: sadness and frustration

Is there anything sadder than the regular news about changes in our climate?  The natural world is no longer natural.  Our actions, especially pumping the atmosphere full of CO2 from cars and power plants, have, to say the least, badly disrupted things.  And recent findings of the National Climate Assessment tell us it will get worse.  More glaciers melting, higher sea levels, more droughts, more torrential rains and flooding.

Is there anything more frustrating and disheartening that the collective failure to stop this?  Certainly, the President is now using regulatory authorities under existing legislation to reduce CO2 emissions.  But there are limits to how much he can accomplish this way and no one expects any new authority from the Congress.  Meanwhile, opponents of climate action cry that these regulations are “a war on coal” and promise opposition in every way possible.

Can we hope that reports like this, along with regular news of climatic disasters (we can’t call them “natural disasters” anymore), will change public views and be translated into political action?
We can only hope — and push wherever we can.

Terra Nova: Une Politique Sociale-Écologique

Terra Nova recently issued a short policy paper entitled Pour une Politique Sociale-Écologique: Protéger l'Environnement et Réduire les Inégalités.  From a relatively quick review, it looks like a useful restatement of the need to combine environmental and social policies.  Terra Nova, which until now I've only been passingly aware of, was created in 2008 and describes itself as an "independent progressive think tank aiming to produce and disseminate innovative political solutions for France and Europe."  It's been compared to the moderately progressive Center for American Progress in the U.S.

The report's emphasis that the poor are the least able to protect themselves from the effects of environmental degradation is not new news.  Nor is it news that environmental programs often face opposition from those claiming that they limit the economic growth that would benefit the poor.  Still, the paper is a timely reminder that, politically and practically, environmental programs and actions to reduce inequalities need each other.  And it presents several arguments in favor of a "politique social-écologique."

The authors promise specific policy proposals in later papers.  They also promise to broaden the discussion to European and international settings.  I'll pay more attention now.